Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login


Submitted on
March 22, 2013
Image Size
491 KB


6,959 (3 today)
424 (who?)
Twilight paint emulation by Raikoh-illust Twilight paint emulation by Raikoh-illust
Emulating Manet's Olympia painting with Twilight, cause I saw that piece recently on an art history class of mine, an amusing, but fun little experiment. And yes, I know she looks a little too humanoid, but I guess this would be more anthro style.
Add a Comment:
PegasisterLady Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Thats beautiful. *no sarcasm*
J25TheArcKing Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Now that's a nice painting, Equestria history lol...
Randomreader-001 Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2013
Did you actually Paint this or did yo use a program? If a program, what program was it?
catachan8 Featured By Owner Sep 26, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
looks great^^ 
Sassycat2 Featured By Owner Sep 13, 2013  Student Traditional Artist
Very beautiful, I love it.
VictoryPie Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
the  style, it's so different, or maybe its her hair or eyes, its just really beautiful
avixl Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2013
It's very beautiful and really well done :) .....but.....Manet's Olympia was a prostitute...don't you think Twily isn't suited to the role?
MyOwnNameWasTaken Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2013
Oh, I don't know. Olympia shocked audiences of the time by presenting a real woman rather than an idealized fantasy of a woman.

Twilight is now an alicorn princess, but she still feels like her old self, and will continue living in Ponyville as a librarian. She also lacks the body type of the other princesses in the show. She's the sort of princess you could meet on the street, just like Olympia was the sort of woman you could meet on the street.
skogga Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2013
...and pay bits for sex?
MyOwnNameWasTaken Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2013
I suppose that is where the analogy breaks down, but are you not obsessing a little on the original character's profession?  This is what clouded Olympia's original reception:  all the critics got offended over the "scandal" of actually depicting a prostitute on canvas, and never considered the painting's merits.

And what a hypocrisy that was:  Victorian salons were full of female nudes languorously offering their bodies to the male viewer.  What made Olympia different was that she was in control of her body and her sexuality:  she was not there for the taking; if you wanted her, you had meet *her* terms.  That is likely what offended the audience the most.  (Even though many of the visitors to those salons had lovers much like her -- perhaps they did not like the reminder?)

Further, the reality of Olympia went beyond the fact of her profession.  Manet didn't correct the harsh studio lighting or rework his model's figure to make her match the physical ideal of his time.  She was a realistic woman, depicted realistically.

Are we still going to quibble over her profession's social stigma, 150 years later?
Add a Comment: